Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$813.64M
- Cash
- −$567.99M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price vs WLK: inconclusive — current versus $0.27 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WLK's multiple
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Needs EOSE P/S.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EOSE FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · WLK FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 61% equity / 39% debt · EV / Revenue 1.16x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Westlake Corporation · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-0.36x
0.69x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.26x
-6.04x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$567.99M
$2.72B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
OLIN Corp
EOSE vs OLN
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO
EOSE vs EMN
Huntsman CORP
EOSE vs HUN
ALBEMARLE CORP
EOSE vs ALB
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC/DE/
EOSE vs RPM
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
EOSE vs PPG
$813.64M
$6.08B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can convert its 631.8% revenue growth into materially positive gross and operating margins, then hold or add despite the current valuation gap, because the market is already pricing in a very large discount on a P/S basis; otherwise, reduce exposure because the present $5.23 price embeds far more optimism than the profitability and Z-Score data support.
EOSE trades at a deep implied downside versus WLK, with the provided P/S-based implied price of $0.29 versus a current price of $5.23, or -94.5% upside/downside. The gap is driven mainly by EOSE's 15.5x P/S and 17.7x EV/Revenue versus WLK's 0.9x P/S and 1.1x EV/Revenue.
Supporting Metrics