Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$813.64M
- Cash
- −$567.99M
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price vs SWK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SWK's multiple
Needs SWK P/S.
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Needs EOSE P/S.
Metric by metric
Live quote
Price unavailable
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EOSE FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · SWK FY 2026 (ended Jan 3, 2026). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Ten fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
-$1.23
Base
-$1.44
Bull
-$1.66
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$7.40
Base
$8.70
Bull
$10.01
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-0.36x
0.64x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.26x
3.78x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$567.99M
$280.10M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$813.64M
$5.81B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
SMITH A O CORP
EOSE vs AOS
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
EOSE vs WHR
NEWELL BRANDS INC.
EOSE vs NWL
Snap-on Inc
EOSE vs SNA
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
EOSE vs ITW
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can convert its 631.8% revenue growth into durable positive margins and avoid distress, then holding may be justified; otherwise, the current $5.23 price looks difficult to defend versus the $0.32 SWK-implied value because EOSE's margins and Altman Z-Score remain extremely weak.
EOSE trades at a steep premium to SWK on sales despite far weaker profitability and much higher loss intensity, which drives the extreme valuation gap. SWK-based implied price of $0.32 versus EOSE's current $5.23 suggests the market is pricing in a very large re-rating that is not supported by current fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics