Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price vs SR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SR's multiple
Needs SR P/S.
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Needs EOSE P/S.
Metric by metric
Live quote
Price unavailable
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EOSE FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · SR FY 2025 (ended Sep 30, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
-$1.23
Base
-$1.44
Bull
-$1.66
Spire Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$31.28
Base
$36.80
Bull
$42.32
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-0.36x
1.14x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.26x
5.19x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$567.99M
$5.70M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$813.64M
$3.86B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
EOSE vs CNP
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
EOSE vs D
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
EOSE vs CHTR
NISOURCE INC.
EOSE vs NI
ATMOS ENERGY CORP
EOSE vs ATO
MGE ENERGY INC
EOSE vs MGEE
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can convert its rapid revenue growth into positive margins and avoid distress, then holding or buying may be justified, but based on the current data the more defensible action is to avoid or underweight EOSE because its valuation is far above SR while profitability and quality are materially weaker.
EOSE trades at a much richer valuation than SR despite materially weaker earnings quality: EOSE’s P/S is 15.5x versus SR’s 1.9x, and the model implies a price of $0.64 versus the current $5.23, or -87.8% downside. The gap is large even though EOSE is growing revenue rapidly, suggesting the market is paying for growth rather than current cash-generation or margin durability.
Supporting Metrics
