Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
$1.66B- Market cap
- $1.41B
- Debt
- +$813.64M
- Cash
- −$567.99M
Capital structure 63% equity / 37% debt · EV / Revenue 14.52x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price at premium vs MTN $3.88 current versus $0.51 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EOSE FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · MTN FY 2025 (ended Jul 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 63% equity / 37% debt · EV / Revenue 14.52x
Capital structure 56% equity / 44% debt · EV / Revenue 2.75x · EV / EBITDA 8.04x
MTN carries the larger enterprise value at $8.16B against $1.66B; MTN trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (2.75x vs 14.52x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Vail Resorts, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-0.36x
8.94x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.26x
3.30x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$567.99M
$440.29M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
EOSE vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
EOSE vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
EOSE vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
EOSE vs LYV
$813.64M
$3.79B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can sustain hypergrowth while rapidly converting revenue into positive gross and operating margins, then hold or accumulate; otherwise, the data favor underweighting EOSE because its current price implies a valuation far above MTN despite much weaker profitability and distress signals.
EOSE trades at a severe valuation premium to MTN despite a much weaker earnings and margin profile. MTN-based implied price of $0.54 is far below EOSE’s current price of $6.07, suggesting the market is already assigning substantial credit to future growth and execution.
Supporting Metrics