Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price vs KAR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KAR's multiple
Needs KAR P/S.
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Needs EOSE P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
OPENLANE, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
COPART INC
EOSE vs CPRT
CARMAX INC
EOSE vs KMX
LITHIA MOTORS INC
EOSE vs LAD
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
EOSE vs PAG
ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC
EOSE vs ABG
GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC
EOSE vs GPI
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can convert its 631.8% revenue growth into durable positive gross and operating margins, then EOSE may be worth holding or adding because the current price is still within its historical $5.46-$6.68 range; otherwise, KAR is the higher-quality relative choice based on its positive margins and balance sheet stability.
EOSE cannot be benchmarked cleanly on P/S versus KAR because KAR has no provided P/S or EV-based valuation multiples, and EOSE’s own multiples are distorted by negative earnings and EBITDA. The stock currently trades at $6.07, essentially in the middle of its $5.46 to $6.68 historical band, so the market is not assigning a clear breakout or capitulation signal from the range alone.
Supporting Metrics
