Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price vs ILMN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ILMN's multiple
Needs ILMN P/S.
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Needs EOSE P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Illumina, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
EOSE vs TMO
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EOSE vs A
DANAHER CORP /DE/
EOSE vs DHR
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
EOSE vs BIO
PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
EOSE vs PACB
Natera, Inc.
EOSE vs NTRA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can convert its 631.8% revenue growth into sustained positive gross and operating margins, then a tactical long position may be justified despite the valuation gap, because the current market price is well above ILMN-implied P/S value but still within the historical trading band.
EOSE’s current price of $6.21 sits 69.1% above the $1.92 ILMN-implied price from the P/S framework, indicating a large relative valuation premium. Even though the stock is within its historical band of $5.59 to $6.83, the gap versus ILMN multiple is driven by EOSE’s much weaker margin profile and lack of earnings power versus ILMN.
Supporting Metrics
