Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EOSE stock price vs BRKR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BRKR's multiple
Needs BRKR P/S.
Implied fair value · at EOSE's multiple
Needs EOSE P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
BRUKER CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fluence Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs FLNC
STEM, INC.
EOSE vs STEM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
EOSE vs ENPH
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
EOSE vs CHPT
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
EOSE vs TMO
DANAHER CORP /DE/
EOSE vs DHR
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EOSE vs A
WATERS CORP /DE/
EOSE vs WAT
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
EOSE vs BIO
BIO-TECHNE Corp
EOSE vs TECH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOSE can convert its 631.8% revenue growth into sustainable positive margins, then consider the stock only as a high-risk turnaround; otherwise, the data favors avoiding or underweighting EOSE because the current $6.06 price is well above the $0.81 P/S-implied value and the business remains deeply loss-making.
EOSE trades at a large valuation premium to BRKR on sales, but that premium is not supported by profitability. The provided P/S framework implies $0.81 versus a $6.06 current price, an -86.7% downside, while the historical band suggests the stock is already near the upper end of its recent range.
Supporting Metrics
