Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EOG stock price vs XOM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at XOM's multiple
Needs XOM P/E.
Implied fair value · at EOG's multiple
Needs EOG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EOG RESOURCES, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Exxon Mobil Corporation · implied price per share
A valid share-count denominator is required for the selected valuation policy.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EOG can sustain its superior margins and ROIC and that the market will apply a valuation multiple closer to Exxon's (18.0x P/E or similar EV/EBITDA re-rating), then buy because XOM-implied P/E multiple implies an upside to $202.92 (87.3%) from the current $108.33; however, limit position size or use staged entries because the low Piotroski F-Score (4/9) and slight revenue decline (-2.0%) introduce execution and quality risk.
EOG trades at a substantial P/E and EV/EBITDA discount to Exxon (9.6x vs 18.0x P/E; 6.8x vs 12.9x EV/EBITDA), producing a XOM-implied upside to $202.92 (87.3%). On a P/S basis EOG is actually higher (2.5x vs 1.8x), so valuation signals are mixed across multiples. The current price ($108.33) sits well inside its historical band ($97.50 - $119.16) and well below the top of XOM-implied range ($75.09 - $202.92).
Supporting Metrics
