Eastgroup Properties, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EGP stock price vs DOC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DOC's multiple
Needs DOC P/E.
Implied fair value · at EGP's multiple
Needs EGP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Healthpeak Properties, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Terreno Realty Corp
EGP vs TRNO
Prologis, Inc.
EGP vs PLD
STAG Industrial, Inc.
EGP vs STAG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
EGP vs KIM
AGREE REALTY CORP
EGP vs ADC
WELLTOWER INC.
EGP vs WELL
Ventas, Inc.
EGP vs VTR
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
EGP vs ARE
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
EGP vs SLG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EGP’s superior margins and lower leverage deserve a meaningful valuation premium over DOC, then hold or accumulate EGP cautiously because the operating data are stronger even though the current price is already near its historical high and the DCF range is far lower than the P/E-implied value.
On a P/E basis, EGP looks dramatically undervalued versus DOC because EGP trades at 41.6x while DOC trades at 211.0x, producing the very large implied price gap shown. However, DOC-implied range is extremely wide and the DCF range is far below the P/E-implied value, which suggests the comparison is sensitive to the chosen valuation method.
Supporting Metrics