Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EGP stock price vs CSGP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSGP's multiple
Needs CSGP P/E.
Implied fair value · at EGP's multiple
Needs EGP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
CoStar Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Terreno Realty Corp
EGP vs TRNO
Prologis, Inc.
EGP vs PLD
STAG Industrial, Inc.
EGP vs STAG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
EGP vs KIM
AGREE REALTY CORP
EGP vs ADC
WELLTOWER INC.
EGP vs WELL
Public Storage
EGP vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
EGP vs EQR
CROWN CASTLE INC.
EGP vs CCI
CENTERSPACE
EGP vs CSR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EGP can sustain its 15.0% operating margin and 35.7% net margin while maintaining moderate leverage, then EGP looks preferable to CSGP on quality-adjusted fundamentals because CSGP’s faster 18.7% revenue growth has not yet produced meaningful profitability.
The comparison shows a dramatic valuation disconnect: EGP trades at 42.9x P/E versus CSGP at 1438.0x, which drives the absurd P/E-implied price of $7,003.06 and the 3250.6% upside figure. However, CSGP also trades at a much lower P/S of 3.6x versus EGP’s 15.6x, so the apparent P/E gap is not supported cleanly by the rest of the valuation set.
Supporting Metrics
