Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EG stock price vs THG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at THG's multiple
Needs THG P/E.
Implied fair value · at EG's multiple
Needs EG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EVEREST GROUP, LTD. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$288.62
Base
$340.06
Bull
$407.05
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC.
EG vs TRV
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD
EG vs RNR
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD.
EG vs ACGL
MARKEL GROUP INC.
EG vs MKL
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
EG vs BRO
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
EG vs HIG
ALLSTATE CORP
EG vs ALL
CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP
EG vs CINF
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INC
EG vs RGA
METLIFE INC
EG vs MET
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EG can re-accelerate growth and sustain its stronger balance sheet while closing the margin gap to THG, then the current valuation looks attractive versus THG implied price because EG trades at lower P/E and P/S multiples with upside to $484.22.
EG trades at a valuation discount to THG on both earnings and sales multiples, which supports THG-based upside estimate. However, the discount is partially explained by EG’s slower growth and weaker profitability quality, so the gap is not a clean mispricing signal.
Supporting Metrics
