Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EBAY stock price vs HUM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HUM's multiple
Needs HUM P/E.
Implied fair value · at EBAY's multiple
Needs EBAY P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
eBay Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$30.05
Base
$37.20
Bull
$46.53
HUMANA INC · implied price per share
Bear
$238.74
Base
$269.81
Bull
$310.28
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AMAZON COM INC
EBAY vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
EBAY vs GOOGL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
EBAY vs PYPL
SHOPIFY INC.
EBAY vs SHOP
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
EBAY vs UNH
Elevance Health, Inc.
EBAY vs ELV
CVS HEALTH Corp
EBAY vs CVS
Cigna Group
EBAY vs CI
CENTENE CORP
EBAY vs CNC
Oscar Health, Inc.
EBAY vs OSCR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EBAY can sustain its 20.5% operating margin and 33.1% ROIC while the market continues to reward earnings quality, then overweight EBAY versus HUM because EBAY trades at a lower P/E despite materially stronger profitability.
EBAY trades at 25.1x P/E versus HUM at 33.3x, yet EBAY has stronger margins and higher ROIC, supporting a relative valuation discount to HUM rather than a premium. The implied price of $144.46 suggests 32.8% upside from the current $108.82, but the DCF range of $55.24-$74.74 argues the market may already be pricing in more than intrinsic value.
Supporting Metrics
