Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs TXN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TXN's multiple
Needs TXN P/E.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · TXN FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 1.71x · EV / EBITDA 11.35x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$106.35
Base
$126.42
Bull
$152.55
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED · implied price per share
Bear
$20.64
Base
$24.46
Bull
$31.23
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
0.89x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
1.25x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$4.88B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$448.00M
$14.55B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
Intel Corporation
EAT vs INTC
QUALCOMM Incorporated
EAT vs QCOM
NVIDIA Corporation
EAT vs NVDA
Broadcom Inc.
EAT vs AVGO
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EAT can sustain its 21.9% revenue growth and defend margins despite operating at much lower profitability than TXN, then EAT looks attractive on relative valuation because it trades at materially lower P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA multiples.
EAT’s current price of $213.70 sits well below TXN-implied $420.95, implying 97.0% upside on the P/E framework. The discount is not just a single-metric artifact: EAT also trades at 1.7x P/S and 12.4x EV/EBITDA versus TXN at 14.2x and 33.3x, respectively.
Supporting Metrics
