Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs PAG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PAG's multiple
Needs PAG P/E.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · PAG FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$108.89
Base
$128.11
Bull
$147.33
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
-$14.24
Base
-$16.75
Bull
-$19.27
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
0.45x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
1.40x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$64.70M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$448.00M
$2.52B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC
EAT vs ABG
AUTONATION, INC.
EAT vs AN
LITHIA MOTORS INC
EAT vs LAD
GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC
EAT vs GPI
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EAT can sustain its 21.9% revenue growth and 64.0% ROIC long enough to justify a 27.0x P/E and 1.8x P/S, then hold or accumulate only on weakness; otherwise, trim or avoid because the current price is far above the DCF range and implies -42.3% downside versus the P/E-based estimate.
EAT’s current price of $224.99 implies -42.3% downside to the P/E-based value of $129.84, indicating the market is paying a much higher earnings multiple than the comparison anchor. The valuation disconnect is reinforced by EAT trading above the top of its historical band and well above the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
Live quote
