Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs NOMD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NOMD's multiple
Needs NOMD P/E.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · NOMD FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$108.89
Base
$128.11
Bull
$147.33
Nomad Foods Limited · implied price per share
Bear
-$20.15
Base
-$23.70
Bull
-$27.26
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
—
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
23.48x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$369.40M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$448.00M
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
MCCORMICK & CO INC
EAT vs MKC
TYSON FOODS, INC.
EAT vs TSN
Post Holdings, Inc.
EAT vs POST
Kraft Heinz Co
EAT vs KHC
GENERAL MILLS INC
EAT vs GIS
HORMEL FOODS CORP /DE/
EAT vs HRL
$3.58B
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EAT can sustain its 21.9% revenue growth and 64.0% ROIC without margin erosion, then hold only if you accept the premium valuation, because the current price is far above the P/E-implied value and above the DCF range.
EAT is trading far above the P/E-derived implied price of $90.98, implying -48.8% downside from the current $177.71 price. The stock is also above the DCF range and near the upper end of its historical band, which suggests most of the good operating news is already reflected in the share price.
Supporting Metrics
