Brinker International, Inc.
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
$233.90M
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
109.8%
Return on assets
17.3%
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $856.52B
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs JPM: inconclusive — current versus $174.95 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JPM's multiple
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Live quote
As of 2025-12-31
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability edge
Asset efficiency edge
Lower is better
Statements
Bank-focused income statement and equity metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · JPM FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
$233.90M
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
109.8%
Return on assets
17.3%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / tangible book
Market cap
$856.52B
Tangible equity
$306.21B
Price / tangible book
2.80x
Price / book
2.36x
Return on equity
15.7%
Return on assets
1.3%
Efficiency ratio
142.8%
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$108.89
Base
$128.11
Bull
$147.33
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
0.92x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
-0.59x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$481.02B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
Bank of America Corporation
EAT vs BAC
Citigroup Inc.
EAT vs C
Wells Fargo & Company
EAT vs WFC
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
EAT vs GS
Morgan Stanley
EAT vs MS
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
EAT vs PNC
US BANCORP \DE\
EAT vs USB
$448.00M
$332.67B
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.