Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs ITW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ITW's multiple
Needs ITW P/E.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · ITW FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$108.89
Base
$128.11
Bull
$147.33
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC · implied price per share
Bear
$96.34
Base
$113.34
Bull
$130.34
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
3.09x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
1.80x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$851.00M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$448.00M
$9.97B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
3M Company
EAT vs MMM
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
EAT vs HON
General Electric Company
EAT vs GE
Parker-Hannifin Corp
EAT vs PH
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EAT can sustain its 21.9% revenue growth while maintaining or expanding margins, then holding or adding makes sense because the stock trades below ITW-implied price and at a lower P/E than ITW; otherwise, the weaker margin structure argues for caution.
On a P/E basis, EAT at 21.4x sits below ITW at 26.0x, and the model’s implied price of $216.34 suggests 21.7% upside from the current $177.71. However, the broader valuation picture is less supportive because EAT also trades at lower absolute multiples on P/S and EV-based metrics, which may reflect its weaker profitability profile.
Supporting Metrics
