Electronic Arts Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EA stock price vs TGT: inconclusive — current versus $70.25 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Implied fair value · at EA's multiple
Needs EA P/E.
Snapshot Sep 8, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Activision Blizzard, Inc.
EA vs ATVI
Unity Software Inc.
EA vs U
MICROSOFT CORP
EA vs MSFT
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC
EA vs TTWO
GameStop Corp.
EA vs GME
Walmart Inc.
EA vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
EA vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
EA vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
EA vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
EA vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
EA vs JWN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EA can sustain a long-term premium valuation well above both TGT implied range and DCF range despite only modest growth, then hold; otherwise, the data favors reducing exposure because EA trades at 59.8x earnings and 7.0x sales versus TGT's much lower multiples.
EA trades at a major premium to TGT across every stated valuation multiple, and the implied P/E-based price of $62.38 is far below the current $209.86 price. The gap is driven more by multiple compression than by fundamentals, but the size of the disconnect is still extreme.
Supporting Metrics