Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EA stock price vs FDS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FDS's multiple
Needs FDS P/E.
Implied fair value · at EA's multiple
Needs EA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Activision Blizzard, Inc.
EA vs ATVI
Unity Software Inc.
EA vs U
MICROSOFT CORP
EA vs MSFT
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC
EA vs TTWO
GameStop Corp.
EA vs GME
MOODYS CORP /DE/
EA vs MCO
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
EA vs MKTX
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
EA vs GPN
FISERV INC
EA vs FI
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
EA vs JKHY
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
EA vs PYPL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EA can materially reaccelerate growth and sustain its premium valuation despite lower margins than FDS, then hold or avoid adding aggressively; otherwise, the valuation gap versus FDS argues for caution because EA trades at 59.8x P/E and 33.7x EV/EBITDA while posting weaker growth and profitability.
EA's current price of $209.86 implies a P/E-based value of just $59.41, or -71.7% downside, indicating a very large premium relative to FDS framework. The gap is especially stark because EA also trades above FDS on P/S and EV-based measures despite weaker margins and growth.
Supporting Metrics
