Dynatrace, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.10B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DT stock price vs JBGS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JBGS's multiple
Needs JBGS P/E.
Implied fair value · at DT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, DT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Dynatrace, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
JBG SMITH PROPERTIES · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Salesforce, Inc.
DT vs CRM
ADOBE INC.
DT vs ADBE
ORACLE CORP
DT vs ORCL
MICROSOFT CORP
DT vs MSFT
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
DT vs CSCO
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
DT vs IBM
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
DT vs AVB
UDR, Inc.
DT vs UDR
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
DT vs ESS
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
DT vs CPT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.