Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DT stock price vs AAPL: inconclusive — current versus $16.35 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AAPL's multiple
Implied fair value · at DT's multiple
Needs DT P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 8.34x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 23.29x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Dynatrace, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Apple Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$130.85
Base
$159.76
Bull
$182.30
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Salesforce, Inc.
DT vs CRM
ADOBE INC.
DT vs ADBE
ORACLE CORP
DT vs ORCL
MICROSOFT CORP
DT vs MSFT
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
DT vs CSCO
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
DT vs IBM
Alphabet Inc.
DT vs GOOGL
Meta Platforms, Inc.
DT vs META
NVIDIA CORP
DT vs NVDA
INTEL CORP
DT vs INTC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DT can sustain its 18.8% revenue growth while improving margins toward AAPL-like profitability, then holding or accumulating makes sense because the current price already embeds a very weak P/E-based valuation versus AAPL and DT’s leverage is low.
On the provided P/E framework, DT screens far richer than AAPL and the implied price is 55.6% below the current price. However, the comparison is mixed because DT also trades at a materially lower P/S and EV/Revenue multiple than AAPL, which suggests the market is paying for AAPL’s superior scale and profitability rather than just revenue growth.
Supporting Metrics
