Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DRI stock price vs MNST: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MNST's multiple
Needs MNST P/E.
Implied fair value · at DRI's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, DRI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Monster Beverage Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
DRI vs EAT
CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC
DRI vs CAKE
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
DRI vs TXRH
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
DRI vs DPZ
McDonald's Corporation
DRI vs MCD
COCA COLA CO
DRI vs KO
PEPSICO INC
DRI vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
DRI vs KDP
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
DRI vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
DRI vs TAP
BROWN FORMAN CORP
DRI vs BF-A
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DRI can sustain its current growth and margins while closing the quality gap to MNST, then holding or adding makes sense because DRI trades at a much lower earnings and sales multiple than MNST despite solid ROIC and decent F-Score support.
DRI's current price of $213.76 is far below MNST-implied value of $411.38, implying 92.4% upside on the P/E comparison. However, that MNST comparison is anchored to MNST's much higher valuation multiples and superior profitability, so the gap is more reflective of business model differences than a clean mispricing signal.
Supporting Metrics
