Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DOV stock price vs WTS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WTS's multiple
Needs WTS P/E.
Implied fair value · at DOV's multiple
Needs DOV P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DOVER Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
DOV vs EMR
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
DOV vs HON
DANAHER CORP /DE/
DOV vs DHR
Parker-Hannifin Corp
DOV vs PH
SPX Technologies, Inc.
DOV vs SPXC
IDEX CORP /DE/
DOV vs IEX
SMITH A O CORP
DOV vs AOS
Xylem Inc.
DOV vs XYL
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp
DOV vs ZWS
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
DOV vs WMS
MASCO CORP /DE/
DOV vs MAS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DOV can narrow the growth and ROIC gap versus WTS while maintaining its current margin profile, then DOV looks worth owning because it already trades at meaningfully lower valuation multiples than WTS.
DOV trades at 26.6x P/E versus WTS at 33.6x, and also at lower P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue multiples, indicating a broad relative valuation discount. However, the implied price of $266.89 sits above the current price of $211.42, but it is still below WTS implied range midpoint and must be weighed against DOV's weaker operating quality.
Supporting Metrics
