Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
-$3.62B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
-0.9%
Net income / ending assets
-0.3%
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DNB stock price vs JPM: inconclusive — current versus $17.45 implied using P/B multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JPM's multiple
Implied fair value · at DNB's multiple
Needs DNB P/B.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability lag
Asset efficiency lag
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
-$3.62B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
-0.9%
Net income / ending assets
-0.3%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / tangible book
Market cap
$855.69B
Tangible equity (USD)
$307.11B
Price / tangible book
2.79x
Price / book
2.36x
Net income / ending equity
15.7%
Net income / ending assets
1.3%
Efficiency ratio
52.4%
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EQUIFAX INC
DNB vs EFX
FAIR ISAAC CORP
DNB vs FICO
TransUnion
DNB vs TRU
Root, Inc.
DNB vs ROOT
Xerox Holdings Corp
DNB vs XRX
Bank of America Corporation
DNB vs BAC
Citigroup Inc.
DNB vs C
Wells Fargo & Company
DNB vs WFC
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
DNB vs GS
Morgan Stanley
DNB vs MS
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
DNB vs PNC
US BANCORP \DE\
DNB vs USB
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DNB can improve profitability and de-lever meaningfully, then a selective long could be justified because its implied price of $18.28 is below JPM-implied range and within the DCF range; otherwise, the weaker margins and higher net leverage argue for caution.
DNB’s implied price of $18.28 sits below JPM-implied range of $26.22 to $33.72 and within the DCF range of $16.36 to $22.13, suggesting the market is already discounting weaker fundamentals. The gap appears driven more by DNB’s lower profitability and leverage profile than by top-line growth, which is similar to JPM’s.
Supporting Metrics