Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DLR stock price vs ECL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ECL's multiple
Needs ECL P/E.
Implied fair value · at DLR's multiple
Needs DLR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
ECOLAB INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$44.93
Base
$57.49
Bull
$73.86
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EQUINIX INC
DLR vs EQIX
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
DLR vs IRM
Prologis, Inc.
DLR vs PLD
Public Storage
DLR vs PSA
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
DLR vs AVB
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
DLR vs SBAC
Procter & Gamble Company
DLR vs PG
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
DLR vs CL
CLOROX CO /DE/
DLR vs CLX
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
DLR vs KMB
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DLR’s 10.0% revenue growth and conservative leverage will translate into materially better future returns, then hold or buy selectively; otherwise, the current premium versus ECL looks hard to defend given DLR’s 54.1x P/E, 2.9% ROIC, and implied -27.6% downside.
DLR is priced at a sizable premium to ECL on the provided multiples, yet the model still implies a -27.6% downside to $140.23 versus the current $193.80. That gap is hard to justify purely from fundamentals because DLR only clearly wins on revenue growth and leverage, not on returns or operating profitability.
Supporting Metrics
