Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Deere & Co
Latest stored price
Reliance, Inc.
Latest stored price
Decision snapshot
DE stock price vs RS: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | DE | RS | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | -11.7% | 3.3% | RS leads by 451.3% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 13.7% | 7.1% | DE leads by 93.3% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 30.0% | 7.7% | DE leads by 289.5% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.7 | 1.1 | RS leads by 146.8% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | DE | Delta vs RS | RS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.68B | 219.6% higher | $14.29B |
| Gross profit | $6.26B | 517.9% higher | $1.01B |
| Operating income | $9.04B | 792.6% higher | $1.01B |
| EBITDA | $13.71B | 1144.9% higher | $1.10B |
| Net income | $5.03B | 579.9% higher | $739.40M |
| EPS | 18.5 | 32.3% higher | 14.0 |
| Revenue growth | -11.7% | 451.3% lower | 3.3% |
| Gross margin | 13.7% | 93.3% higher | 7.1% |
| Operating margin | 19.8% | 179.3% higher | 7.1% |
| EBITDA margin | 30.0% | 289.5% higher | 7.7% |
| Net margin | 11.0% | 112.7% higher | 5.2% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
DE screens as modestly rich versus the P/E-derived implied price and carries meaningfully better profitability than RS, but weaker growth and higher leverage make the relative case mixed.
If you believe DE can re-accelerate revenue growth without sacrificing its superior margins, then hold or accumulate on pullbacks because its profitability profile is materially stronger than RS despite the current -9.3% P/E-based downside.
On the P/E basis, DE appears overvalued versus the implied price of $537.40, with the current price of $592.67 implying -9.3% downside. However, RS-implied valuation range is wide, and DE also sits within its historical band, which tempers the conclusion.
Supporting Metrics