Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Deere & Co
Latest stored price
Morgan Stanley
Latest stored price
Decision snapshot
DE stock price vs MS: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
| Metric | DE | MS | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Price / Book | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
Price / Tangible Book | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
Return on Equity | 19.4% | 15.1% | DE leads by 28.3% Higher Return on Equity |
Return on Assets | 4.7% | 1.2% | DE leads by 299.5% Higher Return on Assets |
Efficiency ratio | N/M | 62.3% | Insufficient data No additional context |
Statements
Bank-focused income statement and equity metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | DE | Delta vs MS | MS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.68B | 22.7% lower | $59.06B |
| Operating / pretax income | $9.04B | 58.5% lower | $21.79B |
| Net income | $5.03B | 70.2% lower | $16.86B |
| EPS | 18.5 | 81.2% higher | 10.2 |
| Revenue growth | -11.7% | 228.1% lower | 9.1% |
| Operating / pretax margin | 19.8% | 46.4% lower | 36.9% |
| Net margin | 11.0% | 61.5% lower | 28.5% |
| Return on equity | 19.4% | 28.3% higher | 15.1% |
| Return on assets | 4.7% | 299.5% higher | 1.2% |
| Efficiency ratio | — | N/A | 62.3% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
For bank comparisons, book value, tangible book, and profitability are better anchors than enterprise value.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both banks in context relative to a wider peer set using equity multiples, returns, and efficiency.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
DE screens expensive versus both MS and its own valuation bands, while weaker growth and middling quality metrics do not justify the premium.
If you believe DE can reaccelerate growth and sustain margins enough to justify a 33.6x P/E, then hold; otherwise, reduce exposure because the stock already trades above both its DCF range and implied valuation while fundamentals lag MS.
DE trades at $620.83 versus an implied P/E value of $391.98, implying 36.9% downside. The gap is notable because DE's P/E of 33.6x is higher than MS's 21.2x even though DE has weaker revenue growth and lower margins.
Supporting Metrics