Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DDOG stock price vs ORCL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ORCL's multiple
Needs ORCL P/E.
Implied fair value · at DDOG's multiple
Needs DDOG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Datadog, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ORACLE CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
PagerDuty, Inc.
DDOG vs PD
Elastic N.V.
DDOG vs ESTC
Dynatrace, Inc.
DDOG vs DT
Zscaler, Inc.
DDOG vs ZS
Cloudflare, Inc.
DDOG vs NET
Microsoft Corporation
DDOG vs MSFT
Amazon.com, Inc.
DDOG vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
DDOG vs GOOGL
International Business Machines Corporation
DDOG vs IBM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
DDOG vs CSCO
Salesforce, Inc.
DDOG vs CRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DDOG can sustain 25%+ revenue growth while quickly turning operating margins positive, then holding or accumulating may be justified; otherwise, the data support rotating toward ORCL because DDOG’s valuation is far richer despite weaker profitability and capital efficiency.
DDOG’s implied price of $6.91 versus its current price of $267.97 suggests a -97.4% gap on the P/E basis, which is driven by DDOG’s extremely high 864.4x P/E relative to ORCL’s 22.3x. On sales and enterprise-value metrics, the gap is less dramatic but DDOG still trades at a premium with a 6.1x P/S and 6.4x EV/Revenue versus ORCL’s 5.6x and 5.0x.
Supporting Metrics
