Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DDOG stock price vs MKSI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MKSI's multiple
Needs MKSI P/E.
Implied fair value · at DDOG's multiple
Needs DDOG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Datadog, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MKS INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$12.57
Base
$24.69
Bull
$40.47
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
PagerDuty, Inc.
DDOG vs PD
Elastic N.V.
DDOG vs ESTC
Dynatrace, Inc.
DDOG vs DT
Zscaler, Inc.
DDOG vs ZS
Cloudflare, Inc.
DDOG vs NET
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
DDOG vs KEYS
Fortive Corp
DDOG vs FTV
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
DDOG vs TDY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
DDOG vs MTD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DDOG can sustain 25%+ growth while converting that growth into materially positive operating margins, then hold or selectively accumulate despite the rich multiple because the current valuation already discounts a lot of future success; otherwise, reduce exposure because the P/E and EV/EBITDA premium versus MKSI is not backed by current profitability.
DDOG’s current price of $267.97 sits far above MKSI-implied value of $21.10, implying a -92.1% downside under the P/E framework. The gap is driven by DDOG’s extremely high P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples versus MKSI, even though DDOG does command better revenue growth and gross margin.
Supporting Metrics
