Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DD stock price vs PPG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PPG's multiple
Needs PPG P/S.
Implied fair value · at DD's multiple
Needs DD P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PPG INDUSTRIES INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
DOW INC.
DD vs DOW
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
DD vs LYB
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO
DD vs EMN
Huntsman CORP
DD vs HUN
Celanese Corp
DD vs CE
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO
DD vs SHW
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC/DE/
DD vs RPM
Walmart Inc.
DD vs WMT
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
DD vs AXTA
FULLER H B CO
DD vs FUL
3M CO
DD vs MMM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DD can rapidly restore profitability and growth to justify an 8.2x P/S and 123.6x EV/EBITDA, then hold or buy; otherwise, the data favor reducing exposure because DD trades far above both PPG-implied and DCF values while fundamentals lag PPG.
DD trades at a very large premium to PPG despite materially weaker operating performance, with the implied P/S-based price of $25.99 suggesting about 81.0% downside from the current $137.00 price. The gap is driven by DD’s much richer valuation multiples, especially P/S and EV/EBITDA, versus PPG’s more normal industrial PPG multiples.
Supporting Metrics
