Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DBX stock price vs FNKO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FNKO's multiple
Needs FNKO P/E.
Implied fair value · at DBX's multiple
Needs EPS (TTM) is negative, DBX P/E.
Metric by metric
Live quote
Price unavailable
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: DBX FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · FNKO FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
Dropbox, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$14.33
Base
$16.86
Bull
$19.39
FUNKO, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
-$3.00M
Base
-$3.53M
Bull
-$4.06M
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-2.09x
0.66x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
3.09x
4.39x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$891.30M
$42.15M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
$3.76B
$123.36M
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DBX can sustain its 27.3% operating margin and 64.0% ROIC despite slightly negative revenue growth, then DBX looks more attractive than FNKO on a relative basis because the operating profile is vastly stronger and the current price still sits within the DCF and historical valuation ranges.
FNKO-implied valuation is $0.00 to $0.00 because FNKO’s P/S is 0.0x, so the relative valuation framework breaks down and cannot anchor a meaningful downside/upside estimate. DBX instead should be viewed against its own historical band and DCF range, where $28.56 sits in the middle of both.
Supporting Metrics
