Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CVS stock price vs QCOM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/E.
Implied fair value · at CVS's multiple
Needs CVS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
17 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CVS HEALTH Corp · implied price per share
Bear
$43.35
Base
$58.49
Bull
$78.21
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
CVS vs WBA
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
CVS vs UNH
Walmart Inc.
CVS vs WMT
Cigna Group
CVS vs CI
HUMANA INC
CVS vs HUM
Elevance Health, Inc.
CVS vs ELV
Broadcom Inc.
CVS vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
CVS vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
CVS vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
CVS vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
CVS vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
CVS vs QRVO
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CVS can materially expand margins and sustain earnings growth enough to justify a 69.2x P/E, then holding or buying may make sense; otherwise, the data argues for caution because CVS trades far above its P/E-implied value while operating with far weaker profitability and higher leverage than QCOM.
CVS is priced well above the P/E-derived implied value of $44.50, implying a -53.8% downside from the current $96.22 price. The gap is driven by CVS’s much higher P/E of 69.2x versus QCOM’s 32.0x, despite CVS having far weaker margins and returns.
Supporting Metrics
