Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CUBE stock price vs LRCX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LRCX's multiple
Needs LRCX P/E.
Implied fair value · at CUBE's multiple
Needs CUBE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CUBESMART · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Public Storage
CUBE vs PSA
Extra Space Storage Inc.
CUBE vs EXR
National Storage Affiliates Trust
CUBE vs NSA
U-Haul Holding Co /NV/
CUBE vs UHAL
Applied Materials, Inc.
CUBE vs AMAT
KLA CORP
CUBE vs KLAC
ASML HOLDING NV
CUBE vs ASML
TERADYNE, INC
CUBE vs TER
ENTEGRIS INC
CUBE vs ENTG
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CUBE can sustain its current margin profile while materially improving growth and returns on capital, then hold or add selectively because the P/E-based valuation implies substantial upside; otherwise, the DCF range and weaker ROIC/leverage profile argue for caution.
CUBE’s current price of $41.46 sits well below the P/E-based implied price of $103.09, suggesting 148.6% upside on a pure multiple basis. However, that gap is hard to interpret cleanly because LRCX trades on much stronger growth and returns, while CUBE is already near the top of its historical trading band.
Supporting Metrics
