Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CUBE stock price vs KRC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KRC's multiple
Needs KRC P/E.
Implied fair value · at CUBE's multiple
Needs CUBE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CUBESMART · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
KILROY REALTY CORP · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Public Storage
CUBE vs PSA
Extra Space Storage Inc.
CUBE vs EXR
National Storage Affiliates Trust
CUBE vs NSA
U-Haul Holding Co /NV/
CUBE vs UHAL
BXP, Inc.
CUBE vs BXP
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
CUBE vs ARE
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
CUBE vs SLG
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
CUBE vs HIW
Douglas Emmett Inc
CUBE vs DEI
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CUBE can sustain its 5.3% revenue growth while improving leverage and operating margins toward KRC's levels, then holding is defensible; otherwise, the current premium valuation looks hard to justify because CUBE trades well above KRC on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA while the model implies 39.6% downside.
CUBE trades at a clear premium to KRC on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, yet the valuation gap is not matched by a proportionate fundamental gap. The model’s implied price of $24.74 suggests meaningful downside versus CUBE's current $40.98 price.
Supporting Metrics
