Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CUBE stock price vs AVGO: inconclusive — current versus $70.96 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Implied fair value · at CUBE's multiple
Needs CUBE P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CUBESMART · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Public Storage
CUBE vs PSA
Extra Space Storage Inc.
CUBE vs EXR
National Storage Affiliates Trust
CUBE vs NSA
U-Haul Holding Co /NV/
CUBE vs UHAL
NVIDIA Corporation
CUBE vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
CUBE vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
CUBE vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CUBE vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
CUBE vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CUBE can sustain its historical trading band while closing the gap in growth and returns, then hold or accumulate selectively because the stock is already well below AVGO-implied P/E valuation; otherwise, avoid paying the implied multiple because CUBE’s DCF range and weaker operating metrics do not justify AVGO-like pricing.
On a P/E basis, CUBE’s current price of $41.77 is well below AVGO-implied price of $70.96, suggesting headline upside of 69.9%. However, that gap is difficult to interpret cleanly because AVGO trades on much richer multiples and materially stronger fundamentals, so the relative valuation premium is doing a lot of work.
Supporting Metrics
Edwyn research
