Cintas Corporation
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$289.02M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CTAS stock price vs MTCH: inconclusive — current versus $87.45 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MTCH's multiple
Implied fair value · at CTAS's multiple
Needs CTAS P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Cintas Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Match Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
UNIFIRST CORP
CTAS vs UNF
ABM INDUSTRIES INC /DE/
CTAS vs ABM
Aramark
CTAS vs ARMK
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
CTAS vs GWW
INTUIT INC.
CTAS vs INTU
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
CTAS vs IRM
Meta Platforms, Inc.
CTAS vs META
Snap Inc
CTAS vs SNAP
PINTEREST, INC.
CTAS vs PINS
VERISIGN INC/CA
CTAS vs VRSN
Apple Inc.
CTAS vs AAPL
NVIDIA CORP
CTAS vs NVDA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CTAS deserves a sustained premium because its 7.7% revenue growth and 7/9 Piotroski score can justify the current multiple, then hold or stay selective; otherwise, reduce exposure because the stock price of $200.39 is far above MTCH-implied and DCF ranges.
CTAS trades at a substantial premium on earnings and sales versus MTCH, with P/E of 45.5x versus 16.3x and P/S of 7.8x versus 2.6x. Despite that premium, the current price of $200.39 sits above MTCH-implied range and far above the DCF range, implying the market is paying for quality and growth well beyond the modeled fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics