Cintas Corporation
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
38.9%
Net income / ending assets
19.0%
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CTAS stock price vs FITB: inconclusive — current versus $76.11 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FITB's multiple
Implied fair value · at CTAS's multiple
Needs CTAS P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability edge
Asset efficiency edge
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
38.9%
Net income / ending assets
19.0%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / tangible book
Market cap
$49.63B
Tangible equity (USD)
$16.71B
Price / tangible book
2.97x
Price / book
2.28x
Net income / ending equity
11.6%
Net income / ending assets
1.2%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Cintas Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
UNIFIRST CORP
CTAS vs UNF
ABM INDUSTRIES INC /DE/
CTAS vs ABM
Aramark
CTAS vs ARMK
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
CTAS vs GWW
INTUIT INC.
CTAS vs INTU
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
CTAS vs IRM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
CTAS vs JPM
Bank of America Corporation
CTAS vs BAC
Wells Fargo & Company
CTAS vs WFC
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
CTAS vs PNC
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP
CTAS vs TFC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CTAS can sustain its 7.7% revenue growth and 32.4% ROIC while holding margins near current levels, then holding may be justified; otherwise, the data support trimming exposure because the current price of $181.37 is far above FITB-implied $71.25 and the DCF range of $50.25 to $67.98.
CTAS is priced far above FITB-based implied value of $71.25, representing a -60.7% downside to the current price of $181.37. The gap is driven by CTAS’s much richer multiples, especially a 41.2x P/E versus FITB’s 16.2x and a 7.0x P/S versus FITB’s 5.2x.
Supporting Metrics