Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CSR stock price vs FRT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FRT's multiple
Needs FRT P/E.
Implied fair value · at CSR's multiple
Needs CSR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CENTERSPACE · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
CSR vs WY
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CSR vs VNO
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
CSR vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
CSR vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
CSR vs UDR
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
CSR vs SLG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
CSR vs KIM
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
CSR vs REG
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
CSR vs BRX
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC /DE/
CSR vs SPG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CSR can close the profitability and leverage gap versus FRT without sacrificing growth, then CSR may be worth owning because it trades below its historical and DCF ranges; otherwise, the richer quality and stronger margins at FRT make CSR's current valuation look more like a neutral hold than a clear bargain.
CSR trades at $54.84 versus a P/E-implied price of $27.05, implying -50.7% downside on that framework, but it also sits within a broader valuation context that is less one-sided. The stock is near the upper half of its historical band and above the top end of the P/E implied range, while the DCF range still brackets the current price.
Supporting Metrics
