Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CSGP stock price vs WPC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WPC's multiple
Needs WPC P/E.
Implied fair value · at CSGP's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CSGP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CoStar Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
W. P. Carey Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
WPC · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
WELLTOWER INC.
CSGP vs WELL
Prologis, Inc.
CSGP vs PLD
Public Storage
CSGP vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CSGP vs EQR
CROWN CASTLE INC.
CSGP vs CCI
CENTERSPACE
CSGP vs CSR
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
CSGP vs ARE
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
CSGP vs BRX
KIMCO REALTY CORP
CSGP vs KIM
REALTY INCOME CORP
CSGP vs O
ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.
CSGP vs EPRT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CSGP can convert its 18.7% revenue growth and 78.9% gross margin into sustained operating profitability, then hold or accumulate selectively because the balance sheet is strong and the market may be underweighting long-term earnings power; if not, the current price appears difficult to support on earnings-based valuation.
The valuation picture is highly sensitive to the metric used: on P/E, CSGP looks extremely rich at 1438.0x versus WPC at 29.6x, but on P/S CSGP is cheaper at 3.6x versus WPC at 9.8x. The provided implied price of $0.59 and downside of -97.9% suggest a severe disconnect under the P/E framework, but this is difficult to reconcile with the much stronger revenue growth profile and lower leverage.
Supporting Metrics
