Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CSGP stock price vs TRNO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TRNO's multiple
Needs TRNO P/E.
Implied fair value · at CSGP's multiple
Needs CSGP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CoStar Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Terreno Realty Corporation · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
WELLTOWER INC.
CSGP vs WELL
Prologis, Inc.
CSGP vs PLD
Public Storage
CSGP vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CSGP vs EQR
CROWN CASTLE INC.
CSGP vs CCI
CENTERSPACE
CSGP vs CSR
INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES INC
CSGP vs IIPR
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
CSGP vs REXR
STAG Industrial, Inc.
CSGP vs STAG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CSGP can convert its 78.9% gross margin and 18.7% revenue growth into sustained operating profit, then holding or adding may make sense because the current price is still within the historical band and leverage is low; otherwise, the weak 0.2% net margin and -2.2% operating margin argue for caution.
CSGP trades at 1504.0x P/E and 3.8x P/S versus TRNO at 18.2x P/E and 15.9x P/S, but the comparison is distorted because CSGP has very low net income and TRNO has materially higher margins. The model also produces an implied price of $0.36 versus a current price of $30.08, which indicates a severe disconnect between the valuation input and the market price rather than a usable standalone CSGP.
Supporting Metrics
