Cisco Systems, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$29.53B
- Cash
- −$7.22B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CSCO stock price vs MOH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MOH's multiple
Needs MOH P/E.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CIENA CORP
CSCO vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
CSCO vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
CSCO vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
CSCO vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
CSCO vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
CSCO vs LDOS
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CSCO vs UNH
HUMANA INC
CSCO vs HUM
Cigna Group
CSCO vs CI
Elevance Health, Inc.
CSCO vs ELV
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CSCO can sustain its high margins and quality scores without a material multiple reset, then holding or accumulating may make sense; however, if valuation re-rates toward the DCF range, the data supports reducing exposure because the implied price is far below the current level.
CSCO’s current price of $120.88 sits well above the implied P/E price of $54.85, implying 54.6% downside from the model. The gap is driven by CSCO’s much richer absolute valuation multiples than MOH, even though CSCO’s business quality is materially stronger.
Supporting Metrics