CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (CSCO) vs. HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. (HIG) Stock Comparison & Valuation | Edwyn

Edwyn

Edwyn Search companies, tickers, CIKs…⌘K

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (CSCO) vs. HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. (HIG) Stock Comparison & Valuation | Edwyn

Updated 2026-07-03 11:18 UTC

This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.

CSCO screens as far more expensive than HIG on headline multiples, but its stronger margins, profitability, and balance-sheet quality make the valuation gap look more like a business-model mismatch than a clean mispricing signal.

Actionable Takeaway

If you believe CSCO can sustain its current profitability and quality metrics long enough to justify a premium valuation, then hold or selectively own CSCO because its margins, ROIC, F-Score, and Z-Score are strong despite expensive multiples; if you require valuation support from HIG or DCF benchmarks, the data argues for caution because CSCO screens well above both HIG and its DCF range.

CSCO trades at a much richer valuation than HIG on every major multiple provided, despite a model that is more profitable but also slower-growing. The implied price of $26.39 versus the current price of $112.69 indicates a -76.6% downside under the P/E comparison, but that HIG-based result is distorted by the difference between a technology/networking business and an insurance company.

Supporting Metrics

Key Risks

CSCO remains expensive relative to HIG on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA (44.2x, 7.8x, 32.6x).
The DCF range of $23.53 - $31.84 is dramatically below the current price of $112.69.
HIG comparison is imperfect because CSCO and HIG have very different business models and margin structures.