Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$5.23B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CRWD stock price vs PAYC: inconclusive — current versus $22.30 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PAYC's multiple
Implied fair value · at CRWD's multiple
Needs CRWD P/S.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Paycom Software, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
CRWD vs MSFT
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
CRWD vs CSCO
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
CRWD vs CHKP
Okta, Inc.
CRWD vs OKTA
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
CRWD vs KEYS
SentinelOne, Inc.
CRWD vs S
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
CRWD vs ADP
PAYCHEX INC
CRWD vs PAYX
INTUIT INC.
CRWD vs INTU
Autodesk, Inc.
CRWD vs ADSK
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
CRWD vs TYL
Salesforce, Inc.
CRWD vs CRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CRWD can sustain 20%+ revenue growth while converting that growth into positive operating margins over time, then holding or selectively adding can be justified because the current premium is supported more by growth than by near-term profitability; if not, PAYC-multiple framework implies significant downside.
CRWD trades at a very large premium to PAYC on both sales and earnings-based valuation, while the implied price from the P/S comparison is far below the current share price. The gap is driven by CRWD's much higher growth rate, but the absolute multiple disparity is still extreme versus a profitable PAYC.
Supporting Metrics