Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CROX stock price vs TJX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TJX's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, TJX P/E.
Implied fair value · at CROX's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CROX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Crocs, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/ · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
CROX · not enough data.
TJX · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP
CROX vs DECK
SKECHERS USA INC
CROX vs SKX
Designer Brands Inc.
CROX vs DBI
NIKE, Inc.
CROX vs NKE
CALERES INC
CROX vs CAL
ROSS STORES, INC.
CROX vs ROST
Burlington Stores, Inc.
CROX vs BURL
NORDSTROM INC
CROX vs JWN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
CROX vs COST
TARGET CORP
CROX vs TGT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CROX can re-accelerate revenue growth and convert its strong gross margin into sustained net profitability, then a relative-value position makes sense because the stock trades below the TJX-implied valuation and within its historical band; if not, the negative growth and earnings profile argue for caution.
On a P/S basis, CROX trades at 1.6x versus TJX at 3.0x, which is consistent with the much lower implied price of $237.50 being far above the current $136.62. However, the stock also trades within its historical band and well below TJX-implied range, while the DCF range is far lower, signaling a wide disagreement between relative and intrinsic frameworks.
Supporting Metrics
