Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: COST stock price vs PYPL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PYPL's multiple
Needs PYPL P/E.
Implied fair value · at COST's multiple
Needs COST P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PayPal Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
COST vs WMT
TARGET CORP
COST vs TGT
KROGER CO
COST vs KR
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
COST vs DG
AMAZON COM INC
COST vs AMZN
HOME DEPOT, INC.
COST vs HD
VISA INC.
COST vs V
Mastercard Inc
COST vs MA
Block, Inc.
COST vs XYZ
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO
COST vs AXP
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
COST vs MKTX
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC
COST vs FDS
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe COST can sustain its higher growth, superior ROIC, and net-cash balance sheet, then hold or accumulate on pullbacks because the business quality is strong even though the P/E multiple is elevated versus PYPL and the current price sits near the top of its historical range.
On a P/E basis, COST trades at 52.1x versus PYPL at 11.0x, which implies COST is much more expensive on earnings. However, the provided implied price for COST is $201.22 versus a current price of $949.15, while the historical band is $854.24 to $1044.07, so the stock is currently trading within that range and closer to the upper half of the band.
Supporting Metrics
