Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: COLM stock price vs VFC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at VFC's multiple
Needs VFC P/E.
Implied fair value · at COLM's multiple
Needs COLM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
V. F. CORPORATION · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe COLM’s stronger balance sheet and better net profitability deserve a premium versus VFC, then holding or modestly adding COLM makes sense because COLM has lower leverage, a 5.2% net margin, and 12.0% ROIC; if you require a clear valuation discount across all multiples, then the case is less compelling because COLM is richer than VFC on P/S and EV/EBITDA.
COLM trades at 18.3x P/E versus VFC at 22.4x, so it is cheaper on earnings despite having better net margin and far less leverage. However, COLM is more expensive on sales and EBITDA-based multiples, which suggests the market is paying for stronger balance sheet quality and cleaner profitability rather than pure revenue scale.
Supporting Metrics
