Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KO stock price vs PEP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PEP's multiple
Needs PEP P/E.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Needs KO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PEPSICO INC · implied price per share
Bear
$33.73
Base
$44.81
Bull
$59.24
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
KO vs KDP
Monster Beverage Corp
KO vs MNST
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
KO vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
KO vs TAP
HERSHEY CO
KO vs HSY
STARBUCKS CORP
KO vs SBUX
Mondelez International, Inc.
KO vs MDLZ
Kraft Heinz Co
KO vs KHC
TYSON FOODS, INC.
KO vs TSN
KELLANOVA
KO vs K
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KO’s premium margins and ROIC can continue to support a higher trading multiple than PEP, then hold or accumulate on pullbacks because KO’s operating quality is strong; otherwise, PEP-implied valuation suggests limited upside and potential downside from the current price.
KO trades at $86.86 versus a PEP-implied price of $70.75, implying an 18.6% downside on the P/E framework. The gap is largely explained by KO’s higher valuation multiples, especially versus PEP on P/S and EV/EBITDA, even though KO also shows superior profitability.
Supporting Metrics
