Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CNA stock price vs ALL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ALL's multiple
Needs ALL P/E.
Implied fair value · at CNA's multiple
Needs CNA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ALLSTATE CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BERKLEY W R CORP
CNA vs WRB
CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP
CNA vs CINF
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
CNA vs HIG
TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC.
CNA vs TRV
Chubb Ltd
CNA vs CB
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
CNA vs AIG
PROGRESSIVE CORP/OH/
CNA vs PGR
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
CNA vs BRK-B
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CNA can close the profitability gap versus ALL while sustaining mid-single-digit growth, then hold or accumulate on weakness because CNA’s quality score is solid and its valuation is not expensive on some relative bases; if not, the current price looks hard to justify versus the DCF range and lower-margin ALL comparison.
CNA is trading at 11.1x P/E versus ALL at 7.0x, so it does not look cheap on the most direct earnings multiple even though the DCF range and historical band sit below the current price. The implied price of $32.90 suggests meaningful downside versus the current $52.02, but that estimate conflicts with ALL range and historical range, creating a mixed valuation picture.
Supporting Metrics
