Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CI stock price vs PDCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PDCO's multiple
Needs PDCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at CI's multiple
Needs CI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Cigna Group · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
CI vs UNH
CVS HEALTH Corp
CI vs CVS
HUMANA INC
CI vs HUM
CENTENE CORP
CI vs CNC
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INC
CI vs WST
BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC
CI vs BAX
HENRY SCHEIN INC
CI vs HSIC
OWENS & MINOR INC/VA/
CI vs OMI
CARDINAL HEALTH INC
CI vs CAH
BECTON DICKINSON & CO
CI vs BDX
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CI can sustain 11.2% revenue growth while maintaining current margins and leverage, then holding or adding makes sense because the stock is not outside its historical band and the operating profile is stronger than PDCO’s on scale and growth.
CI is trading at $282.49 versus a historical band of $254.24 to $310.74, placing the stock in the upper half of its recent range but still below the high end. On a relative basis, CI has visible valuation metrics at 12.7x P/E, 0.3x P/S, 9.0x EV/EBITDA, and 0.4x EV/Revenue, while PDCO lacks comparable multiples in the dataset, limiting direct gap assessment.
Supporting Metrics
