Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CHRW stock price vs UHAL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UHAL's multiple
Needs UHAL P/E.
Implied fair value · at CHRW's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CHRW P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
U-Haul Holding Company · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC
CHRW vs EXPD
XPO, Inc.
CHRW vs XPO
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
CHRW vs JBHT
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC
CHRW vs LSTR
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
CHRW vs UPS
FEDEX CORP
CHRW vs FDX
RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\
CHRW vs RUSHA
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
CHRW vs CAR
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC
CHRW vs HTZ
RYDER SYSTEM INC
CHRW vs R
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHRW can stabilize revenue growth while preserving its high ROIC and strong balance sheet, then holding or modestly accumulating CHRW is reasonable because the quality metrics are solid even though UHAL-relative valuation signal is mixed.
CHRW trades at 30.9x P/E versus UHAL at 177.5x, while the model’s P/E-based implied price for CHRW is $857.53, far above the current $149.34. However, UHAL-relative case is inconsistent across valuation bases because CHRW also trades at 1.1x P/S versus UHAL at 0.2x and 1.2x EV/Revenue versus UHAL at 1.4x.
Supporting Metrics
